Legal Opinion
Perdue v. Murphy
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 2010No. 49A02-1003-PL-250PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
The ACLU of Indiana ("the ACLU") brought a class action complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to enjoin the practice of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration ("the FSSA") to issue adverse action notices pertaining to Medicaid, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families ("TANF"), and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ("SNAP") (collectively, "public benefits programs"), which notices generically alleged a failure to cooperate but did not specify which verification document was missing (according to FSSA records). The complaint further…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Reeder v. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perdue v. GarganoIndiana Supreme Court · 2012