Legal Opinion

Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Mill Bakery & Eatery, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 9, 1991No. 2900200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a zoning case.

The circuit court determined that the appellee, the Mill Bakery and Eatery, Inc. (The Mill), did not need a variance for on-premises retail liquor sales, given that this use had already been established by a previous variance. Furthermore, the trial court held that if a variance were needed, it should be granted based on The Mill’s reliance on the previous variance, and that to deny it would result in unnecessary hardship. The City of Huntsville (City) now brings this appeal.

The City contends that the trial court erred in holding that The Mill did not need…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Priest v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Lawless v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Board of Zoning Adjustment v. LaGrange ChurchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. CITY OF RUSSELLVILLE ZONING BD. v. VernonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API