Legal Opinion

United States v. McVeigh

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1997No. 96-1469, 96-1475, 96-1484PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated proceedings, we address an important question of criminal procedure involving significant interests of the defendants, prosecution, crime victims, and public, which has thus far received virtually no judicial attention: whether a pretrial order prohibiting victim-impact witnesses from attending the criminal prosecution in which they are slated to testify is subject to review at the urging of either the government or the nonparty witnesses themselves. Upon careful consideration of the various constitutional and statutory ramifications, we conclude as a general matter, and…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Huminski v. CorsonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Huminski v. CorsonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. W. Patrick Kenna v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. O'Connor v. Washburn UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API