Legal Opinion

Samuels v. Couzens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. Docket No. 90PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

In July, 1919, the common council of the city of Detroit adopted the following ordinance:

“An ordinance to regulate and license the business of selling jewelry, other than second-hand jewelry, in the city of Detroit.
“Section 1. No person, firm or corporation shall engage in the business of selling jewelry, other than second-hand jewelry, without first having obtained a license from the mayor of the city of Detroit.
“Sec. 2. Any person, firm or corporation desiring to engage in the business of selling jewelry shall make *605application in writing to the mayor of the city of Detroit, stating the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Samuels v. CouzensMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Westervelt v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Eastwood Park Amusement Co. v. Mayor of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Altop v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Village of Waterbury v. MelendySupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. PinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API