State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Pinson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
This is an appeal by condemnees from a condemnation judgment and order and from the order denying a new trial. Appellants assert a total failure of proof to support the judgment, both as to the necessity for the taking and as to the compensation. They also contend that they have been deprived of their property without due process of law and without just compensation.
The property condemned, as well as the parcel severed, comprised portions of lands that had been owned by the Pinson family for a great many years and operated by them as a cattle ranch. Portions of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Samish River Boom Co. v. Union Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Kansas City & Grandview Railway Co. v. HaakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- State ex rel. Carlson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Friendly v. LarsenNevada Supreme Court · 1944
- Dutertre v. ShallenbergerNevada Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Latchis v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Kern River Gas Transmission v. Clark County, Nev.District Court, D. Nevada · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. ShaddockNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Hawthorne v. PeeblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- City of Las Vegas v. BustosNevada Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.