Legal Opinion

McCue v. J. F. Shea Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

This controversy involves the construction of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, as amended by chapter 684 of the Laws of 1937. It arises upon three motions: (1) By defendant Angelilli for an order granting judgment on the pleadings and dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as to him; (2) by the defendants J. F. Shea Company, Inc., and Henry J. Kaiser Company, for judgment on the pleadings strildng out and dismissing the “ Second, Separate and Complete Defense ” *558of the defendant Angelilli in his answer to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Milks v. McIverNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. O'Brien v. LodiNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Pulver v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Graham & Norton Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Calagna v. Sheppard-Pollak, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Alexander v. CreelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
  3. Musco v. LupiNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Christison v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Eisenberg v. Louis Adler Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API