Legal Opinion
Martin E. Grossman v. James McDonough
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 16, 2006No. 05-11150PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
In this death case Martin E. Grossman appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He claims that his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated when the state trial court refused to sever his case from his co-defendant, whose confession — which also implicated Grossman — was introduced at trial, albeit against only the co-defendant. Grossman also maintains that the state impermissibly withheld Brady material concerning three prosecution witnesses, and that he received ineffective assistance…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Terrell M. Johnson v. Secretary, DocCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Joshua Daniel Bishop v. Warden, GDCPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Morris v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Loggins v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.