Minor v. Hogg
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 38, April T., 1917, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1914, No. 2106, for defendant n. o. v. in case of W. J. Minor v. George Hogg. Assumpsit for injuries to goods. Before Cohen, J. The facts are stated in the, opinion of the Superior Court. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $138.43. Subsequently the court entered judgment for defendant, n. o. v. Error assigned was in entering judgment for defendant n. o. v.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Oklady, P. J.,
This action of assumpsit was brought to recover damages caused by injuries to goods in the storeroom of the plaintiff, occupied by him under a lease from the defendant, which described the property as follows: “All that certain storeroom situate and known as 406 Braddock Avenue, Braddock, Pennsylvania.” It was stipulated in the lease that among other things, the tenant was required “to make all necessary repairs thereto, to maintain and keep the premises during the term in good re.pair, including water pipes, their connections and all plumbing fixtures,......and to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Germansen v. EganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Adler v. SklaroffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Dubois Recreation Co. v. BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Germansen v. EganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937