Legal Opinion
MATTER OF BELL v. Waterfront Comm.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1967PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.Y.2d 54 (1967)
In the Matter of Peter Bell, Appellant,
v.
Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued April 11, 1967.
Decided May 31, 1967.
Michael B. Standard for appellant.
Irving Malchman, William P. Sirignano and Anthony L. Piazza for respondent.
Sanford M. Katz for New York Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.
Judges VAN VOORHIS and BERGAN concur with Chief Judge FULD; Judge KEATING concurs in result only; Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI and BREITEL dissent and vote to affirm without prejudice to an application by appellant for reinstatement.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Holy Spirit Ass'n v. RosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. Waterfront CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nysa-Ila Vacation and Holiday Fund and Nysa-Ila Gai Fund v. The Waterfront Commission of New York HarborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Thaler v. ThalerNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. TanseyNew York Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.