Legal Opinion

Russo v. Digest

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony J. Ferraro, J.

Petitioner makes application for enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum requiring respondent to produce certain enumerated documents at a fair hearing presently in progress before the State Division of Human Rights.

Respondents claim that the documents requested are irrelevant to the complaint filed and instead of making a motion to quash have refused to supply the information thus precipitating this motion.

The crux of the complaint is that respondent discriminated against petitioner in employment by denying her equal terms, conditions and privileges of employment and by terminating her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Holland v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dias v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Thompson v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API