Legal Opinion

Vallance v. Bausch

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1859PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the surrogate of New York admitting a will to probate. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.*—Sutherland, J.

This is an appeal from the decree of the surrogate of Hew York, admitting to probate the will of Catharine E. Bausch, the wife of the respondent.

- The testratrix was the owner of certain personal property, and, during coverture, made her will, bequeathing the same, bearing date December 1, 1856. She died on the 27th of March, 1857, leaving no children, but leaving her husband, the respondent, and the appellant, her mother, her surviving.

The appellant attended, as her next of kin, at the probate, and filed objections thereto, and prayed to have said objections…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mc'Cartee v. Orphan Asylum SocietyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
  2. Executors of Moffat v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  3. McCosker v. GoldenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1849

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robins v. . McClureNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Burke v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  3. In re WinneNew York Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Jaycox v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Tompkins v. RiceNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API