Springfield Armory, Inc. v. City of Columbus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Chief Judge.
Two manufacturers, a dealer and two potential purchasers of weapons challenge the constitutionality of a Columbus city ordinance that bans assault weapons. The ordinance defines “assault weapon” as any one of thirty-four specific rifles, three specific shotguns and nine specific pistols, or “[o]ther models by the same manufacturer with the same action design that have slight modifications or enhancements.... ” The weapons are specified by brand name and model, not generically or by defined categories.
Plaintiffs challenge the ordinance as an unconstitutional bill of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Peoples Rights Organization, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. City of Columbus, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Wilson v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.