Legal Opinion

Springfield Armory, Inc. v. City of Columbus

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1994No. 92-4126, 92-4223PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Chief Judge.

Two manufacturers, a dealer and two potential purchasers of weapons challenge the constitutionality of a Columbus city ordinance that bans assault weapons. The ordinance defines “assault weapon” as any one of thirty-four specific rifles, three specific shotguns and nine specific pistols, or “[o]ther models by the same manufacturer with the same action design that have slight modifications or enhancements.... ” The weapons are specified by brand name and model, not generically or by defined categories.

Plaintiffs challenge the ordinance as an unconstitutional bill of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Peoples Rights Organization, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. City of Columbus, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wilson v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2012

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API