British Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
Introduction
The novel issue raised, with far-ranging implications in international trade, is whether under the facts and circumstances presented here certain benefits provided by the United Kingdom (U.K.) government used to “restructure” British Steel Corporation’s (BSC) steel-making facilities are subsidies subject to countervailing duties.
Pursuant to section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1516a) BSC, the only U.K. producer and/or exporter to the United States of stainless steel sheet and plate, and British Steel Corporation, Inc., the exporter’s American…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Downs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- ASG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- ASG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- British Steel PLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Cabot Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Al Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.