Legal Opinion

United States v. Flannery

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1939No. Nos. 4487, 4488PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Careful consideration of the questions involved in these cases convinces us that the decisions below were correct for reasons adequately stated in the opinions of the District Judge. Flannery v. United States, 25 F.Supp. 677; Spaid v. United States, 28 F.Supp. 670. As nothing could be added by further discussion of the questions, in the decision of which the lower court followed decisions of the Second Circuit (Helvering v. Archbald, 70 F.2d 720, Helvering v. Walbridge, 70 F.2d 683), the opinions of the District Judge are adopted as the opinions of this Court.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Helvering v. WalbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Helvering v. ArchbaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Flannery v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
  4. Spaid v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. United States v. Flora F. Herring, Administratrix of W. A. Herring EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  3. Schmidinger v. WelshDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1965
  4. Porter v. BowersDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1947