In re K.M.T.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Respondent Ramsey County Community Human Services Department (RCCHSD) initiated an action to terminate the parental rights of R.J.A. and appellant to their daughter, K.M.T. The mother appeals, contending there was insufficient evidence for the trial court to grant the petition. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
Appellant’s ten-year-old daughter K.M.T. is a “special needs” child who has been diagnosed as mildly mentally retarded and “attention deficit disordered.”
Appellant is the mother of four children. She is mentally retarded with an IQ of 62. Her reasoning and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re the Welfare of P.J.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- In re the Welfare of R. M. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Zerby v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- McDonald v. CopperudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of B.L.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of KMTCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986