Legal Opinion

In re the Welfare of R. M. M.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1982No. 52081PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

This is an appeal by E. A. M. from an order of the Ramsey County District Court, Juvenile Court Division, terminating her parental rights to her son, R. M. M. III. Because E. A. M. is an Indian and R. M. M. Ill is an Indian child, the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1963 (Supp.1981), applies to this case. That act requires the state to notify an Indian child’s tribe of any proceedings involving the custody of that child. 25 U.S.C. § 1912(a) (Supp.1981). Since E. A. M. is a member of the Fon Du Lac Band of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, the Chippewa Tribe was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Zerby v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re the Welfare of P.J.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. In Re the Welfare of A.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Matter of Welfare of MaasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Matter of Welfare of UdstuenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API