Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Justin v. Trump Jr.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 7, 2025No. 5:25-cv-03787Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MALIK JUSTIN, Case No. 25-cv-03787-LJC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 9 v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE 10 DONALD TRUMP JR., DENIED AND COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 2 12 13 I. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 14 Pro se Plaintiff Malik Justin applied to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. Justin 15 responded “No” to every question that he answered on his application form, indicating that he has 16 no assets or income of any kind. Justin failed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Charleston Area Medical Center v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API