Legal Opinion

Boddicker v. ESURANCE INC.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 2, 2011No. CIV. 09-4027-KESPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Ryan Boddicker, filed suit against defendant, Esurance Inc., 1 for violations of the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). The court granted Esurance’s motion for summary judgment in part, including on Bod-dicker’s COBRA claim. Boddicker now moves to reconsider and vacate the grant of summary judgment on the COBRA claim. Esurance resists. The motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

The facts, viewed in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. Mallinckrodt, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trumble v. TrumbleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Karg v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API