Legal Opinion

Karamsetty v. Wells Fargo & Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 19, 2013No. 12-cv-01364-JCSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF LAURA HURLEY AND KATHLEEN CA-HILL SLAUGHT

Dkt. Nos. 42, 50, 54

PUBLIC VERSION

JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq. Plaintiff Vinay Karamsetty (“Plaintiff’) filed this lawsuit against Defendants Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) and Wells Fargo Company Salary Continuation Pay Plan (“the Plan”).…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schuman v. Microchip Tech. Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API