Karamsetty v. Wells Fargo & Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF LAURA HURLEY AND KATHLEEN CA-HILL SLAUGHT
Dkt. Nos. 42, 50, 54
PUBLIC VERSION
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq. Plaintiff Vinay Karamsetty (“Plaintiff’) filed this lawsuit against Defendants Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) and Wells Fargo Company Salary Continuation Pay Plan (“the Plan”).…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schuman v. Microchip Tech. Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018