Legal Opinion
Trajkovski Invest AB v. I.Am.Plus Electronics, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 9, 2022No. 2:21-cv-04246Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:21-cv-04246-ODW-JEM Document 44 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:682 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 9 Central District of California 10 11 TRAJKOVSKI INVEST AB, et al., Case № 2:21-cv-04246-ODW (JEMx) 12 Petitioners, ORDER DENYING 13 v. RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR 14 I.AM.PLUS, ELECTRONICS, Inc. , RELIEF FROM FINAL 15 JUDGMENT [33] Respondent. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Respondent I.AM.PLUS, Electronics, Inc. moves for relief from judgment, 20 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b). (Mot. Relief J. (“Motion” 21 or “Mot.”), ECF No. 33.) On January…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shannon Casey v. Albertson's Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In the Matter of Christian and Porter Aluminum Company, Bankrupt. Kerry H. Gough, Trustee v. Dewayne F. TitusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Reed v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Alhambra-Shumway Mines, Inc. v. Alhambra Gold Mine Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- United Medical Management Ltd. v. GattoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.