Farrar v. Hobby
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
506 U.S. 103 (1992)
FARRAR et al., co administrators of ESTATE OF FARRAR, DECEASED
v.
HOBBY
No. 91-990.
United States Supreme Court.
Argued October 7, 1992.
Decided December 14, 1992.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
2Opinion of the Court · ThomasThomas, J.
J., and O'Connor, Scalia, and Kennedy, JJ., joined. O'Connor, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 116. White, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Blackmun, Stevens, and Souter, JJ., joined, post, p. 122.
Gerald M. Birnberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Michael A. Maness and…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Thomas; Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited33 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Maria Morales v. Sonya FryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Bravo Ex Rel. Gonzales v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Irvine Unified School District v. K. G.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- (PC) Church v. NaftzgerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Bravo Ex Rel. Gonzales v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.