Prise v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
I. Introduction
CONTI, District Judge.
Pending before the court is a motion to decertify the conditionally certified collective action (ECF No. 1608). The motion was filed by defendant Alderwoods Group (“Alderwoods” or “defendant”) on January 31, 2011. Plaintiffs Deborah Prise and Heather Rady (together with opt-in plaintiffs, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all employees similarly situated, moved to conditionally certify a collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Defendant asserts the conditionally certified class is ripe for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Lessie Anderson v. Cagle's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Dillon v. ColesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Lusardi v. LechnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alers v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Gulick v. City of PittstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- DIFLAVIS v. CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- IVANOVS v. BAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- MCDONNELL v. KRG KINGS LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.