Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. Obstetrics-Gynecological & Infertility Group, P.C.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 27, 2003No. 3:01 CV 02050 GLGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
IBACKGROUND/FACTS
The defendants in this case, Obstetrics-Gynecological & Infertility Group, P.C., Lawrence Wartel, M.D. and Joel S. Silidker, M.D. (Group), move for summary judgment [Doc. 9] on count one of the plaintiffs complaint, which is based on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The plaintiff, Ruth Stein-berg, M.D., alleges that the defendants failed to distribute to her the proper amount of funds to which she claims she is entitled to under the Group’s Profit Sharing Plan (Plan). The defendants argue that because the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Schering Corporation v. Pfizer Inc. And Ucb Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Parsons v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Kennedy v. Empire Blue Cross And Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Robinson v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HailiHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Batoh v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Floodbreak, LLC v. Art Metal Industries, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Simkins v. McIntoshDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- State v. HailiHawaii Supreme Court · 2003