Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 2, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*314OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously reversed, defendant’s motion denied and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.

Although a defendant charged with a traffic infraction has no statutory right to a speedy trial, he nevertheless has a constitutional right to a speedy trial (People v Fisher, 167 Misc 2d 850). In People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442, 445), the Court set down the following factors which are to be considered on a case-by-case basis in determining whether a defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial:

“(1) the extent of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. FisherCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DorilasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
  2. People v. GrahamCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2011
  3. People v. MahmoodCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  4. People v. WalkerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  5. People v. MayAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API