Legal Opinion

Desiderio v. Ochs

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2003PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ClPARICK, J.

In Bryant v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. (93 NY2d 592 [1999]) and earlier cases, we interpreted some of the “nuts- *165and-bolts” calculations required by the structured judgment provisions of CPLR articles 50-A and 50-B. In this medical malpractice action, defendant hospital, by its insurance carrier, claims that the legislative intent that prompted enactment of article 50-A prohibits literal application of the statute when the resulting structured judgment might exceed the jury’s future damages award. We disagree and affirm the Appellate Division order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Bryant v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Schultz v. Harrison Radiator Division General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. 49 WB, LLC v. Village of HaverstrawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. State v. ZimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Toledo v. IGLESIA NI CHRISTONew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Garrison v. LapineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Kash v. Jewish Home & Infirmary of Rochester, N.Y., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API