Legal Opinion

Salvador Rivera v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 2005No. 03-35548PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge.

Salvador Rivera, a.k.a. Salvador Galvan-Gaspar, (hereinafter “Rivera”) appeals the District Court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Rivera alleges that he is a United States citizen who was wrongly removed to Mexico, that his Due Process rights were violated during removal proceedings before Immigration Judge Anna Ho, and that he is entitled to a declaration by the District Court that he is a United States citizen. We find that the District Court has jurisdiction to hear Rivera’s citizenship claim and remand for further proceedings.

F…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Galina Ivanovna Smolniakova v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Anderson v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Alfred Minasyan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Iasu v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Poole v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API