Legal Opinion

Kirby Building Systems, Inc. v. Independence Partnership No. One

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1981No. 5500PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

This appeal is from an order dismissing an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The issue before us concerns whether the district court correctly found as a matter of law that the notice requirement in § 29-2— 110, W.S.1977, was not satisfied. That statute provided:

“Every person, except the original contractor, who may wish to avail himself of the benefits of the provisions of this act [§§ 29-2-101 to 29-2-124], shall give ten (10) days notice, in writing, before filing the lien, as herein required, to the owner, owners or agent, or either of them, that he or they hold a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. EmersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bancroft v. JaguschWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Madison v. MarlattWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Martin & Luther General Contractors, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Torrey v. TwifordWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Amrein v. Wyoming Livestock BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Osborn v. ManningWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Majority of the Working Interest Owners in the Buck Draw Field Area v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Stalkup v. State Department of Environmental QualityWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API