Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 6, 1930No. 29171Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

John T. Gibbons has applied -for a rehearing, contending that the Southern ¡Surety -Company is liable in solido for the obligations of the contractor, under the contract, and that, according to section 6 of Act 224 of 1918, the surety company cannot urge any defense which the contractor could not urge successfully. Our answer is that the -surety on the contractor's bond was not liable at all for purchases made by the contractor, except for material furnished for the construction of the road. In so far as the contractor might have been concerned in the defense, he…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. RaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Lamotte v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. Dunbar v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  4. Wills v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API