Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1 PPEAL from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans, Reynolds, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Lea. J.

The defendant Murphy is appellant from a judgment condemning him to pay the costs of a survey made by the late George T. Dunbar, in virtue of an order of court rendered in a certain suit (not yet decided) in which Robert Murphy and Casimir Gardanne are plaintiffs and N. N. Destrehan is defendant. Murphy denies that said Dunbar was ever appointed by him, or that he was ever appointed by the court at his request, or on his application ; and further, pleads prescription. We think it is manifest, from an examination of the record of the case in which Dunbar was appointed to act as an…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Southern Wood Distillates & Fiber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Union Title Guarantee Co. v. PerkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Cousin v. KennerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Freiman v. Parish of LafayetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API