South Carolina State Highway Department v. Parker Water & Sewer Sub-District
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Justice.
The sole question for determination in this appeal is whether the defendant, a political subdivision and owner of water and sewer lines placed in an existing right of way of a public highway, is required to pay, in the absence of agreement thereabout, the cost of relocating such facilities when the relocation is necessitated by highway improvements.
*140The plaintiff, South Carolina State Highway Department, is an agency of the State and charged with the duty of constructing and maintaining the State system of highways. The defendant, Parker Water and Sewer Sub-District, is a body…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Edge v. BriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- City of San Antonio v. Bexar Metropolitan Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Jones v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- State Road Com'n of Utah v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Artesian Water Co. v. State, Department of Highways & TransportationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- State Hwy. Dept. v. PARKER W. AND S. DIS.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966