Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 4, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1393Published

1Opinion of the Court

*710OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge.

On May 1, 1974, Gerald Cheatham, the petitioner herein, sustained a lumbosacral strain while performing duties associated with his employment. A claim for workmen’s compensation benefits was filed and accepted by the respondent carrier.

On September 3,1974, the carrier issued a notice of claim status terminating compensation and active medical treatment because Cheatham was stationary and the back injury resulted in no permanent disability. The notice of claim status was protested and hearings held, which resulted in findings that petitioner’s condition was stationary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Home Insurance Company v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Chavarria v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Chavarria v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API