Legal Opinion

Pearl Realty Co. v. State Highway Commission

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1934No. 30918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

On February 27,1933, the appellee, state highway commission, filed its bill of complaint alleging, in substance, that it had leased certain floors in a building owned by appellant, known as the Tower building, for a period of two years, which expired on February 28, 1933; that it was ready, anxious, willing, and able to remove itself and all its effects, supplies, equipment, furniture, and other personal property from the office space then occupied by it in said Tower building, and had attempted to do so, but the appellant, in violation of law and in violation of the terms and provisions of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Board of Sup'rsMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Smith County v. MangumMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Bridges v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Marion County v. FoxworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co. v. Warren CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bruner v. University of Southern MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State Highway Commission v. MasonMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lee County v. JamesMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Burt v. CalhounMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Mosman v. MathisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API