Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Cal-Dive International, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided March 6, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15-2526 (LEAD)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RULING

REBECCA F. DOHERTY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Currently pending before the Court are two motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. Nos. 66, 68] filed by all defendants in these consolidated suits. Pursuant to their motions, defendants seek dismissal of all claims asserted in this matter. Alternatively, defendants move the Court to strike the redundant and immaterial portions of plaintiffs’ pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). For the following reasons, defendants’ motions are GRANTED.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

A. The Schmidt Litigation

Pla…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brackens v. Stericycle, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
  2. Cook v. Parish of JeffersonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  3. Cook v. Parish of JeffersonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  4. Hynes v. Lakefront Management AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  5. Jones v. Southern UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API