Legal Opinion

Hill v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1916No. 7428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Trover; from city court of Houston county — Judge Eiley. March. 16, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. A bill of sale of personalty to secure a debt, although it contains a clause to reconvey the property upon the payment of the debt, is not a mortgage, but is an absolute conveyance of the property, and passes title to the same until the debt is fully paid. Civil Code, § 3306; Owens v. Bridges, 13 Ga. App. 419 (79 S. E. 225).

(a.) The court did not err in admitting in evidence the bill of sale from the defendant to the plaintiff, conveying a mule to secure a debt.

2. This suit is in substance an action of trover for the collateral (a mule) which was deeded to the plaintiff to secure a debt.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Owens v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bromley v. BromleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Watts v. Wight Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  3. Worsham v. PennCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Jackson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Keel v. AttawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API