Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp. v. Duncan-Spangler Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1938No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The question involved upon this appeal is one of law —whether the court below erred in holding, under the several written instruments relied upon by the respective parties, that the defendant, as the owner of a seam of coal, was not required, when mining and removing the same, to support an overlying vein owned by the plaintiff.

As we understand the record, it is conceded, at least for the purposes of this case, that in 1907, Blubaker Coal Company was the owner in fee of two strata or seams of bituminous coal underlying some eight hundred acres of land in Susquehanna…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Williams v. HaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Penman v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Lenox Coal Co. v. Duncan-Spangler Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Lacy v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp. v. Duncan-Spangler Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API