Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1950No. Appeal, 90PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

The adjudication of this controversy depends on the proper interpretation of the language reserving mineral rights in a deed of conveyance of a tract of land from William Rawle et al. to Jacob S. Young et al. dated August 28, 1855. The deed in question contained the following provisions: . the said parties of the first part hereto [the grantors] do hereby reserve to themselves their heirs executors administrators and assigns forever the full entire complete and exclusive ownership and right as though the present conveyance had not been made to all metals…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Taylor v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Dowgiel v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Jones v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ChernickySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. New Charter Coal Co. v. McKeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Merrill v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Amerikohl Mining Co. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API