Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Hanna

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 23, 1987No. 22802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance, Respondent is charged with acts of misconduct arising out of his representation of Wilbert Grissett. The Hearing Panel and Executive Committee found Respondent had engaged in attorney misconduct; both recommended a public reprimand. We agree with these findings and, as amended, with the recommended sanction.

In November 1981, Respondent was retained to represent Wilbert Grissett for injuries received when, as a pedestrian, he was struck by an automobile. Grissett signed an undated “Employment Agreement and Power of Attorney” giving Respondent “full power to sign my…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Matter of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Parkman v. HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. In the Matter of HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. In the Matter of HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API