State v. Farlow

PERRY, Chief Judge.

Martin R. Farlow appeals from his judgment of conviction for four counts of delivery of a controlled substance and two counts of possession of a controlled substance. Specifically, Farlow asserts the district court erred in failing to conduct an in-camera examination to determine if a confidential informant had relevant and useful information. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm Far-low’s judgment of conviction but remand his case for further proceeedings.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

An undercover police agent conducted several controlled methamphetamine purchases from B.W.…