Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gilbert v. Miodovnik

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 2010No. 07-CV-315Published

1DissentRuiz, Associate Judge

This medical malpractice case presents an issue of first impression for our court: when does a non-primary, or consulting, doctor owe a duty to a patient? 1 Specifically, we are asked whether Dr. Miodovnik owed a duty of reasonable care to Mrs. Saara Abdul-Haqq, a patient of the District of Columbia Birth Center (“DCBC”). We are not asked to decide what the standard of care is or whether it was breached, as the case did not proceed on that basis to summary judgment in the trial court.

As the majority correctly notes, in most of our previously-decided medical malpractice cases, there has been…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Meek v. ShepardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. District of Columbia v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API