Anagnost v. Layhe
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE GREIMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
The petitioner, Themis Anagnost (Anagnost), is a licensed attorney over the age of 75 years who filed nomination papers in the Republican primary for the office of supreme court judge in the March 17, 1992, primary election. The respondent, Geoffrey R. Layhe (Objector), is a registered voter who filed objections to those nomination papers by reason of the Compulsory Retirement of Judges Act (Judges Act) requiring automatic retirement at the expiration of the term in which a judge attains the age of 75 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 37,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- The People v. DeatherageIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- 19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 418, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9188 Raymond E. Trafelet v. James R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buckley v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Maddux v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Orr v. EdgarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- HON. BERNSTEIN v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.