Scott v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
In these refund suits the Government requests our approval of an administrative gloss on the concept of “bona fide resident” as it appears in § 911(a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, relieving certain Americans of federal income tax on earnings abroad. The separate claims of taxpayers Frank Scott and Alvin and Barbara Warnick1 were consolidated for trial because of similar questions of law and fact. From the trial commissioner’s decision for the taxpayers, the Government seeks review.2 Both parties accept the commissioner’s basic findings of fact. However, the Government rejects Ultimate…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glenn Weible and Patricia Weible v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Howard J. Sochurek v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SwentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Krichbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1956
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Louis H. MooneyhanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schoneberger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Vento v. Director of Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Park v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Riley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.