Peanut Co. v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J., concurring in result; WALKER, J., concurring in the opinion of MR. JUSTICE BROWN; ALLEN, J., concurring. After stating the case: In Harper v. Express Co., 148 N.C. 87-90, the Court, in speaking to the question of damages, recoverable by reason of wrongful delay in shipment of goods, said: "Where the goods shipped have a market value, and there is nothing to indicate the specific purpose for which they were ordered, these damages are usually the difference in the market value of the goods at the time for delivery, and that when they were in fact delivered. We have so held in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bourland v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Rocky Mount Mills v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Purcell v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Williams v. Carolina & Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Harper Furniture Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Carmichael v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- North Carolina Lumber Co. v. Spear Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Muskegon Agency, Inc. v. General Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.