Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bill v. Gattavara

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1946No. 29788PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

On November 27, 1943, Nick Bill and wife commenced an action in the superior court for King county against Lee Garner and wife, and Jim Hailstone and wife. The action, as shown by the complaint, was based upon the claimed unlawful cutting and removal of timber from plaintiffs’ land by defendants. On January 2, 1945, Nick Bill and wife filed and served an amended complaint, naming as defendants Victor Gattavara and wife, Lee Garner and .wife, and Jim Hailstone and wife.

The basis of the cause of action stated in the amended complaint is found in paragraphs 4 and 6, the former reading as follows:

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Larson v. American Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Eckhart v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hubbard v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Oldfield v. Angeles Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Beadle v. BartaWashington Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Birchler v. Castello Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bill v. GattavaraWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ventoza v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Bloedel Timberlands Development, Inc. v. Timber Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Getzendaner v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API