Legal Opinion
Maddox v. County of San Mateo
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 26, 1990No. C-89-0008 RFPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PECKHAM, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
This matter comes before the court on defendants’ second motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a black man, has brought suit against the County of San Mateo (“County”) and individual defendants Donati, Frimmersdorf, Fagetti, and MeCreadie under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985, and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (California Government Code § 12900 et seq., hereinafter “FEHA”), alleging that Defendants subjected him to racially motivated discrimination and harassment in his employment in the San…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Joseph A. Mondzelewski, Rebecca Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores, Inc., Supermarkets General Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Thomas v. Adams (In Re Gary Brew Enterprises Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1996
- Thomas v. Brugh (In re Brugh)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1996
- Mondzelewski v. PathmarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998