Legal Opinion

Merck & Co. v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 29, 2007No. 2006-1401Published

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the question of whether a patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Act, 35 U.S.C. § 156, may be applied to a patent subject to a terminal disclaimer under 35 U.S.C. § 253, filed to overcome an obviousness-type double-patenting rejection. Because the language of § 156 is unambiguous and fulfills a purpose unrelated to and not in conflict with that of § 253, we hold that a Hatch-Wax-man term extension may be so applied.

I. BACKGROUND

Merck & Co, Inc. (“Merck”) is the inventor of TRUSOPT®, a drug used to treat glaucoma. On June 26, 1987, Merck filed a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API