Legal Opinion

Hyer v. Sutton

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Erie county. Action by Ada A. Hyer against George Sutton to recover a deficiency remaining after sale under a chattel mortgage. A demurrer to the answer was-overruled, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorlett, J.

On the 2d day of July, 1888, the defendant executed a chattel mortgage to the plaintiff to secure the sum of $700. It covered a printing-press and some other personal property. It provided for payment within five years from the date of the mortgage, with semi-annual interest, with the-right to pay $100 and interest at any time. It provided that in case of nonpayment the mortgagee could enter the premises and take possession, and then contained the following clause: “And, in case the said Ada A. Johnson shall deem the said property or debt unsafe, it shall be lawful for her to-take possession…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roy v. GoingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Werner v. BergmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Furlong v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Davenport v. LedgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Domenico v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. In re the PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API