Werner v. Bergman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sedgwick District Court. Replevin brought by Werner against Bergman. Trial at the May Term, 1881, of the'district court, and judgment for defendant. The plaintiff brings the case here. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action of replevin brought by Emil Werner against M. A. Bergman, to recover certain goods and chattels used by the defendant in keeping a restaurant. The facts of the case appear to be substantially as follows: On July 2, 1879, Mrs. M. A. Bergman was keeping a restaurant in Wichita, Kansas. On that day she borrowed some money of the plaintiff, Werner, and gave her promis*61sory note therefor. The note was dated July 2, 1879, was for the sum of $125, and was due in sixty days after date. •She also gave a chattel mortgage to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hall v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Bailey v. GodfreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Cline v. LibbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Furlong v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Huebner v. KoebkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Manhattan Life Insurance v. GosfordNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- R. P. Harris & Co. v. ThomasAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Richardson v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Thorp v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Feller v. McKillipMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.