Fahey v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a motion by the United States (“government”) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of *523Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The plaintiff, Susan Fahey (“Fahey” or “plaintiff’) alleges that the government breached two mail-delivery contracts that she had with the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”) by terminating these contracts for convenience.
Ms. Fahey claims that the terminations are improper because the contracts were terminated in retaliation for alleged “whistleblow-ing” by her with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Dangfeng Shen Ho v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.