State v. S.P.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
After the trial court determined he had the capacity to commit a crime, S.P., a juvenile, was convicted of two counts of indecent liberties. Although the standard range for these offenses was a total of 16 to 24 weeks, the trial court concluded a sentence within the standard range would effectuate a manifest injustice and sentenced S.P. to 104 weeks. He appeals, contending (1) the evidence was not sufficient to overcome the presumption that he did not have the capacity to commit a crime, (2) the admission of hearsay at the sentencing hearing deprived him of his right of confrontation, and (3)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. Q.D.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State v. WhittingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. TaualaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. S.P.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. LinaresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- In re Tyvonne M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. B.E.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.