Legal Opinion

Sensale v. Applikon Dyeing & Printing Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 7, 1951PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

12 N.J. Super. 171 (1951)

79 A.2d 316

THERESA SENSALE, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY SENSALE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

APPLIKON DYEING & PRINTING CORPORATION (NOW KNOWN AS BERTHUM CORPORATION) AND HUMBERT CORPORATION, CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND ARTHUR NAZZARO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 12, 1951.

Decided March 7, 1951.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. David Cohn argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. John W. Hand argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennington Trap Rock Co. v. Pennington Quarry Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  2. Reliable Woodworking Co. v. LindemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  3. Rose v. BernhardtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Saltiel v. GSI Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Louis Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores, Inc., a Corporation Abe B. Cohen, James L. Grady, Charles Finke, and Burt RosenburgCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  3. Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. McGlynn v. SchultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Fenning v. SG Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API